Naraguna:Wirjadisastra/bak wedhi: Béda antara owahan

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tanpa ringkesan besutan
Larik 50:
 
===Hipotèsis tlaga kuna===
Pangira-ira bab ananing tlaga kang ngupeng Barabudhur tau dadi rembug gedhé ing antaraning para arkéolog nalika abad 20. Ing 1931, juru kagunan uga nimpuna ing babagan tata wangunan Hindhu-Buddha saka Walanda aran [[W.O.J. Nieuwenkamp]] mbabar hipotèsis yèn Ngaré Kedhu duk nguni minangka tlaga lan Barabudhur ing sakawit pindha padmakembang traté kang kumambang ing satengahé.<ref name="casparis" /> Barabudhur wis kapesthèkakékayektèkaké yèn kaadegaké ing gumuk watu ampar (''bedrock hill''), 265 m ing dhuwursandhuwuring palumahanpalumahaning sagara lan 15 m ing sadhuwuring amparaning tlaga kuna (''floor of paleolake'') kang wis asat.<ref name="Murwanto" />[[File:Borobudur-Temple-Park Indonesia Stupas-of-Borobudur-04.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Exposed Buddha image within the [[stupa]]s of Borobudur upper terraces]]
 
Dumarçay karo Mahaguru [[Ganapathi Thanikaimoni|Thanikaimoni]] njupuk conto lemah ing 1974 lan manèh ing 1977 saka kedhukan kalèn ing gumuk mau, uga saka ngaré ing sakidulé. Conto-conto mau banjur ditaliti Thanikaimoni kang mriksa kandhutankandhutaning sari lan sporané saperlu meruhi jinisning thethukulan kang tau tumuwuh ing laladan mau nalika jaman yasaning Barabudhur. Saka panalitèn iku ora tinemu ananing sari lan spora saka thethukulan kang tumuwuh ing kukuban banyu kaya ta tlaga, kedhung, utawa rawa. Laladan kang ngupeng Barabudhur dinuga minangka palemahan tetanèn lan patalan (palemahan kang ngemutinuwuhan akèh wit tal) nalika yasané, kaya déné kaanan saiki. Caesar Voûte lan géomorfolog aran J.J. Nossin nalika kajian lapangan ing 1985–86 mriksa manèh hipotèsis tlaga Barabudhur lan mesthèkaké yèn ora tau ana tlaga kang ngupeng Barabudhur nalika yasané lan nalika isih kaanggo minangka panyepèn. Tetemon iki kababar ing ''A New Perspective on Some Old Questions Pertaining to Borobudur'' (basa Jawa: Panemu Anyar bab Sawatara Pitakon Lawas Babagan Barabudhur) ing babaranbabaraning UNESCO ing 2005 kang asesirah "The Restoration of Borobudur" (basa Jawa: Maluyakaké Barabudhur).
Speculation about a surrounding lake's existence was the subject of intense discussion among archaeologists in the 20th century. In 1931, a Dutch artist and scholar of Hindu and Buddhist architecture, [[W.O.J. Nieuwenkamp]], developed a [[hypothesis]] that the Kedu Plain was once a lake and Borobudur initially represented a [[lotus flower]] floating on the lake. It has been claimed that Borobudur was built on a bedrock hill, {{convert|265|m|ft|abbr=on}} [[above sea level]] and {{convert|15|m|ft|abbr=on}} above the floor of a dried-out [[Lake Borobudur|paleolake]].
 
Dumarçay karo Mahaguru [[Ganapathi Thanikaimoni|Thanikaimoni]] njupuk conto lemah ing 1974 lan manèh ing 1977 saka kedhukan kalèn ing gumuk mau, uga saka ngaré ing sakidulé. Conto-conto mau banjur ditaliti Thanikaimoni kang mriksa kandhutan sari lan sporané saperlu meruhi jinisning thethukulan kang tau tumuwuh ing laladan mau nalika jaman yasaning Barabudhur. Saka panalitèn iku ora tinemu ananing sari lan spora saka thethukulan kang tumuwuh ing kukuban banyu kaya ta tlaga, kedhung, utawa rawa. Laladan kang ngupeng Barabudhur dinuga minangka palemahan tetanèn lan patalan (palemahan kang ngemu akèh wit tal) nalika yasané, kaya déné kaanan saiki. Caesar Voûte lan géomorfolog aran J.J. Nossin nalika kajian lapangan ing 1985–86 mriksa manèh hipotèsis tlaga Barabudhur lan mesthèkaké yèn ora tau ana tlaga kang ngupeng Barabudhur nalika yasané lan kaanggo minangka panyepèn. Tetemon iki kababar ing ''A New Perspective on Some Old Questions Pertaining to Borobudur'' (basa Jawa: Panemu Anyar bab Sawatara Pitakon Lawas Babagan Barabudhur) ing babaran UNESCO 2005 kang asesirah "The Restoration of Borobudur" (basa Jawa: Maluyakaké Barabudhur).
 
Dumarçay together with Professor [[Ganapathi Thanikaimoni|Thanikaimoni]] took soil samples in 1974 and again in 1977 from trial trenches that had been dug into the hill, as well as from the plain immediately to the south. These samples were later analysed by Thanikaimoni, who examined their pollen and spore content to identify the type of vegetation that had grown in the area around the time of Borobudur's construction. They were unable to discover any pollen or spore samples that were characteristic of any vegetation known to grow in an aquatic environment such as a lake, pond or marsh. The area surrounding Borobudur appears to have been surrounded by agricultural land and palm trees at the time of the monument's construction, as is still the case today. Caesar Voûte and the geomorphologist Dr J.J. Nossin in 1985–86 field studies re-examined the Borobudur lake hypothesis and confirmed the absence of a lake around Borobudur at the time of its construction and active use as a sanctuary. These findings ''A New Perspective on Some Old Questions Pertaining to Borobudur'' were published in the 2005 UNESCO publication titled "The Restoration of Borobudur".
 
==Sajarah==